MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION
to wind up the debate on the statement by the Commission
pursuant to Rule 123(2) of the Rules of Procedure
on 2014 Commission Progress Report on Turkey
(2014/2953(RSP))
Kati Piri
on behalf of the Committee on Foreign Affairs
B8‑0000/2014
European Parliament resolution on 2014 Commission Progress Report on Turkey
(2014/2953(RSP))
The European Parliament,
– having regard to the Commission 2014 Progress Report on Turkey (SWD(2014)0307),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 8 October 2014 entitled ‘Enlargement strategy and main challenges 2014-2015’ (COM(2014)0700),
– having regard to its previous resolutions, in particular those of 10 February 2010 on Turkey’s progress report 2009[1], 9 March 2011 on Turkey’s 2010 progress report[2], 29 March 2012 on the 2011 progress report on Turkey[3], 18 April 2013 on the 2012 progress report on Turkey[4], 13 June 2013 on the situation in Turkey[5], and of 12 March 2014 on the 2013 progress report on Turkey[6],
– having regard to the Negotiating Framework for Turkey’s accession to the EU of 3 October 2005,
– having regard to Council Decision 2008/157/EC of 18 February 2008 on the principles, priorities and conditions contained in the Accession Partnership with the Republic of Turkey[7] (‘the Accession Partnership’), and to the previous Council decisions of 2001, 2003 and 2006 on the Accession Partnership,
– having regard to the Council conclusions of 14 December 2010, 5 December 2011, 11 December 2012, 25 June 2013 and 16 December 2014,
– having regard to Article 46 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) which states that the contracting parties undertake to abide by the final judgements of the European Court on Human Rights (ECtHR) in any case to which they are parties,
– having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
– having regard to the World Bank report of 28 March 2014 entitled “Evaluation of the EU-Turkey Customs Union”,
– having regard to the Commission report on the progress of Turkey in fulfilling the requirements of its visa liberalisation roadmap (COM(2014)0646),
– having regard to Rule 123(2) of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the fact that accession negotiations with Turkey were opened on 3 October 2005 and that the opening of such negotiations is the starting point for a long-lasting and open-ended process based on fair and rigorous conditionality and a commitment to reform,
– having regard to the fact that the EU remains committed to further enlargement as a key policy to promote peace, democracy, security and prosperity in Europe; having regard to the fact that each candidate country will be judged by its own merits,
– having regard to the fact that Turkey has committed itself to the fulfilment of the Copenhagen criteria, adequate and effective reforms, good neighbourly relations and progressive alignment with the EU; having regard to the fact that these efforts should be viewed as an opportunity for Turkey to strengthen its institutions and continue its process of modernisation,
– having regard to the fact that the EU should remain the benchmark for reforms in Turkey,
– having regard to the fact that full compliance with the Copenhagen criteria and the EU’s integration capacity, in accordance with the conclusions of the December 2006 European Council meeting, remains the basis for accession to the EU,
– having regard to the fact that the rule of law in the accession process - including, in particular, the separation of powers, the fight against corruption and organised crime, freedom of expression and the media, the rights of women, the rights of (national) minorities, and tackling discrimination against vulnerable groups such as the Roma and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) persons - is of central importance,
– having regard to the fact that in its communication entitled ‘Enlargement strategy and main challenges 2014-2015’ the Commission concluded that Turkey is a strategic partner for the European Union, in economic and energy security terms, and that cooperation on foreign policy issues with Turkey is crucial,
– having regard to the fact that, for the ninth consecutive year, Turkey has still not implemented the provisions stemming from the EC-Turkey Association Agreement and the Additional Protocol thereto; having regard to the fact that this refusal continues to have a profound negative effect on the negotiation process,
– having regard to the fact that Turkey needs to step up its efforts to resolve outstanding bilateral issues, including unsettled legal obligations and disputes with its immediate neighbours over land and maritime borders and airspace, in accordance with the provisions of the UN Charter and with international law,
NEW - having regard to the a number of unresolved corruption cases, the handling of the Gezi Park protests, arrests and intimidation of journalists, blocking of social media and websites and sometimes erratic statements by leading Turkish political leaders and officials against the EU;
NEW - having regard to the fact that according to the ranking made by Freedom House for press and media freedoms, Turkey is now being ranked as not having a free press and internet freedom being only partly free;
NEW - having regard to the fact that Reporters without Borders classified Turkey in 2014 as one of the countries where journalists suffered the most threats and physical attacks;
Strategic importance of EU-Turkey relations
- Welcomes the Commission’s 2014 progress report on Turkey and shares its conclusion that Turkey is a strategic partner for the EU and that active and credible accession negotiations would provide the most suitable framework for exploiting the full potential of EU-Turkey relations; stresses that the accession process is a unique opportunity for Turkey to develop a strong pluralistic democratic system, with solid institutions, for the benefit of all citizens of Turkey; questions whether sole focus on EU-Turkey relations is the most promising path for reforms in Turkey; considers accession talks so far could have been used much more efficiently by the Turkish government to foster a pluralistic and democratic society;